Review of “A Good Neighborhood” by Therese Anne Fowler

This story is set in Oak Knoll, a fictional gentrifying neighborhood in North Carolina. The Whitmans, a white family of some renown (Brad Whitman heavily advertises his HVAC company), bought a “tear-down” and had a large house and pool built on the site. Neither Brad nor the builders gave a thought to the destruction of all the trees on the property, nor how the construction might damage old trees with extensive roots in adjacent lots. Brad, in fact, doesn’t let much of anything get in his way when he wants something.

The Whitman’s next-door neighbor, Valerie Alston-Holt, an African-American woman with a dual Ph.D. in forestry and ecology, cared very much about the trees. The eighty-foot oak in her yard – the very reason she bought the house so many years ago – was indeed damaged by the construction and was beginning to show signs of distress.

This wasn’t the only source of tension between the two neighbors. The Whitman’s 17-year-old daughter Juniper (who had taken a “Purity Vow”) and Valerie’s 18-year-old mixed-race son Xavier were attracted to one another.

As the story progresses, the strains intensify as racism, class privilege, and sexual attraction all combine to create a horrifying denouement.

Evaluation: This is a compelling and tragic story that would be excellent for book clubs because there is so much to discuss. My only objection was the use of the first-person plural narrator (representing the other neighbors in Oak Knoll). This omniscient “we” knew all about the innermost thoughts and private moments of the members of the two families dominating the story. That seemed very unlikely.

Rating: 3.5/5

Published by St. Martin’s Press, a division of Macmillan Publishers, 2020

About rhapsodyinbooks

We're into reading, politics, and intellectual exchanges.
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Review of “A Good Neighborhood” by Therese Anne Fowler

  1. I am reading a book right know who took on the omniscient narrator and I don’t really click with that. The story is told in third person but it leads to such a “tell no show”. The topic is great, the plot is nice, but this .. this just bugs me to no end.

  2. BermudaOnion says:

    I’ve read such mixed things about this book and can’t decide if I should pick it up or not.

  3. Jeanne says:

    The “we” does sound awkward. I met this author last year at a conference and thought she was really lovely.

  4. Mystica says:

    I like the story which you have reviewed as it covers so many interesting strands – particularly society today. Thanks for the review.

  5. litandlife says:

    The omniscient narrator, that happened to be the community, was actually one of the things I liked about this book because it was such a unique way to narrate a book. But it does require a suspension of disbelief in that it requires you to believe that the “neighborhood” would know everything.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.