Review of “Fathomless” by Jackson Pearce

Imagine you couldn’t decide between pizza, Chinese food, or burritos for dinner. Would you just give in and have some of all three or would you decide to have one on each of three separate occasions? In this young adult paranormal fantasy, it seems as if the author has analogously opted to have everything at once.

There are at least three separate paranormal plots going on in this book and they don’t really don’t seem to go together at all. We have a sisterhood of girls who live underwater, we have a set of triplets each with a different extrasensory skill, and we have a third (and the most bizarre plot line of all) group of beings that I won’t discuss much because it may be spoilery.

The story is told in alternate chapters by Lo (one of the sea sisters) and Celia (one of the triplets). Both of them are attracted to a boy Jude for no apparent reason except they like his eyes. In between trying to make time with Jude, the girls tell their stories – at least to the extent they know them, which isn’t a lot. Lo has no idea who she used to be or how she got to be a sea sister, but believes in the legend decreeing that she needs to kill a boy who loves her in order to return to human form and retrieve her soul:

“Make him love you, kiss him, drown him. Earn his soul, and you get your humanity back – the escape from the ocean that the older girls told her about on her very first day.”

(In all other respects, these sea sisters aren’t dumb. But here, they are convinced that grabbing a boy and asking this total stranger as they try to drown him “Do you love me?”, will inspire the boy to do so. This seems unbelievably silly, even for sea nymphs without the power to check Wikipedia for verification.…)

Celia has the power to see a person’s past. This gift has always made her feel useless, especially vis-à-vis her other two sisters’ gifts, but now Lo’s need to know who she used to be offers her a chance to redeem herself.

The third plot line, involving a mysterious scarred man who may or may not be an angel, is not as central, but always looms over the other two.

The author seems to want to be saying something about sisters, but the story is so contradictory I can’t tell what it is. Are sisters the ultimate good or the ultimate evil? Lo herself is a huge contradiction, with a personality that flips as much as a mermaid tail (which the sea sisters do not have, by the way). Some of that flipping is part of the plot, but some of it seems like the author herself got confused. And Jude is a nobody. He provides nothing whatsoever to the plot except to be a focal point for Celia and Lo.

Evaluation: This story is definitely intended as a dark retelling of “The Little Mermaid” by Hans Christian Andersen (you can read the original online here) but that’s about the only “definite” thing I can say about this book. On the author’s website, I learned that this book is a “companion book” to Sisters Red and Sweetly, but there is absolutely no indication of that anywhere on or in the book itself. Maybe this book would have made more sense to me had I read the earlier books, but I just thought this book was a bit of a mess. The different segments don’t mesh, and we get only the barest of explanations about what happened to one character in one aspect of her life, but not any whys or wherefores for the whole paranormal mishmash generally.

Rating: 1.5/5

Published by Little, Brown and Company, 2012


About rhapsodyinbooks

We're into reading, politics, and intellectual exchanges.
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Review of “Fathomless” by Jackson Pearce

  1. Sandy says:

    I have a hard time with one paranormal plot line, so three would overdose me and send me into a coma I fear. No thanks. (And I’m following YOU around today.)

  2. Brooke says:

    I’m reading Sisters Red right now and from what I can gather from your post, having read Sisters Red or Sweetly would not have helped your reading of Fathomless. I think they are all separate retellings of different fairy tales, so no way to really overlap. I’m enjoying Sisters Red well enough to keep reading, but nothing’s blowing my hair back. At least the plot seems to flow far more naturally and make much more sense than this story. And yes, Jackson Pearce seems a bit obsessed with sisters in all her books.

  3. I’m with Sandy on this one – one paranormal plot line is almost more than I can handle. I’ll skip this one.

  4. Ugh, I’ll stay far away from this one!

  5. Heather says:

    I didn’t detest this one as much as you did, but I agree it has a lot of problems. I have no interest in reading the other two books that it’s a “companion” to.

  6. The whole, “I’m killing you – don’t you love me?” thing seems psychotically messed up.

  7. Jenners says:

    In answer to the most important question asked in your review, I would choose pizza. Not even a contest.

  8. zibilee says:

    I don’t think this one sounds like it was executed well at all, and can see why you had so much trouble with it. I can imagine that I would too, especially since everything is so unclear throughout the story. And as far as pointless characters go, I sort of detest them. I am glad that you were so unflinchingly honest about this one, and I can’t even imagine reading the first two books only to get to this one last, where everything seems like a mess.

  9. Beth F says:

    Er, um. when the plot lines don’t seem to go together, I’m usually happy to pass.

  10. This one doesn’t really sound like one I would enjoy… I’ll pass. Great, honest review!

  11. I don’t read paranormal but this doesn’t sound good anyway. You were brave to finish it.

  12. I enjoy lots of plot lines when they are weaved together, like The Demon Lover by Juliet Dark, but when it seems like 3 books in one, as apparently this one does, I’m out.

  13. CuriousSue says:

    Oh, the terrible travails of sea nymphs unable to access Wikipedia. Sometimes bad books make for the best reviews. 😀

  14. Honestly, it all sounded convoluted to me! 😦
    I steer clear of those 1.5 rating books from you as I know for a fact that I wouldn’t enjoy it either!!

  15. Belle Wong says:

    I like paranormal plots, but one is probably enough for a single book. When there are more, I’d prefer them to be related to each other somehow, otherwise things could get mighty disjointed. Oh, and Chinese food.

  16. aartichapati says:

    I don’t think is for me. I can’t even handle ONE paranormal plot, let alone three.

    I have a couple of books to read by the end of January so maybe we target early February for the Churchill book? I should be ready to hate on the British upper-crust at that time 🙂

  17. stacybuckeye says:

    Yikes! 3 paranormal storylines at once is at least 2 too many.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.