Review of “Gun, With Occasional Music” by Jonathan Lethem

Whenever we travel, one of our first stops is always the local indie bookstore. Once inside, I head straight to the Staff Recommendations. This book was one of those, and a book I never would have even noticed otherwise. (I think the indie in this case was the incomparable Politics and Prose, but I can’t be certain because we hit on more than one on our last trip to D.C.)

Gun, With Occasional Music (GWOM) is wildly different and creative. This is a scifi/noir/detective story, but those categorizations only begin to describe this book that, as a Newsweek critic wrote, “marries Chandler’s style and Philip K. Dick’s vision.” And indeed, the opening lines of the second chapter of Raymond Chandler’s final book, Playback, served as the inspiration for this one, as elucidated by the epigraph: “There was nothing to it. The Super Chief was on time, as it almost always is, and the subject was as easy to spot as a kangaroo in a dinner jacket.”

GWOM is set in a futuristic California in which evolved animals perform the menial tasks; where the population is kept subdued by legalized addiction to drugs referred to collectively as “make” (drugs like “Forgettol” and “Acceptol”); and where words in newspapers have been outlawed and replaced by only pictures. (Music is also acceptable for the expression of ideas. For example, when an evolved baby (called a “babyhead”) or perhaps a kangaroo pulls out a gun and points it at you, the gun might play a few bars of “ominous, pulsing violin.”) In this new world, criminals are frozen for the length of their term, citizens have to accrue karma points to stay out of trouble with the Inquisitor’s Office, and personal formulae for addictive drugs are kept on a computer at a “makery” where you pick up your supply of “make.”

Conrad Metcalf is a P.I. (here meaning, Private Inquisitor) who is, like most other citizens, addicted to “make” (but because of his job requirements, lays off the Forgettol, opting instead for Regrettol). He is looking into the murder of Maynard Stanhunt, who had hired Metcalf just a week earlier to investigate his wife, Celeste, a typical noir mystery “dame”:

“Celeste Stanhunt was a nice-looking woman who became something more when you were being paid to peek through her windows. To put it simply, there hadn’t been any need to undress her in my mind.”

Indeed, at one point, Celeste, in an attempt to manipulate Metcalf, “applied herself to the front of my body like a full-length decal…”

But like all noir, there is darkness, as with this scene reminiscent of the movie “Blue Velvet”:

“For Celeste, I knew as surely as our hips had ground together, danger was the intoxicant, and if there wasn’t danger there would have to be something else, some other malign aphrodisiac. I wanted to hit her as much as I wanted to fuck her, and she probably wanted to be hit as much as she wanted anything.”

Metcalf quit the Inquisitor’s Office to go private because, besides the usual noir mystery reasons of the protagonist being a loner and having an adverse reaction to authority, Metcalf maintained that “the inquisitors specialize in nifty solutions at the expense of truth.…” But one of Metcalf’s enemies points out Metcalf is no different:

“‘The Office and the makery – they’re one and the same to me,’ he said. ‘Make is a tool for controlling great masses of people. It homogenizes their response to repression, don’t you think? You consider yourself an outsider, a seeker of truth amidst lies, yet you’ve bought into the biggest lie that can be told. You snort that lie through your nose and let it run in your bloodstream.”

Metcalf prefers to say that he is “looking at the world through a rose-colored bloodstream…”

As Metcalf closes in on the truth of what happened to Stanhunt, there are a lot more deaths, as well as informative encounters with ewes, apes, and the kangaroo named Joey. Metcalf keeps losing his karma, and the only question is, will he also lose his life? Or has he already lost it?

Evaluation: This was fun, but a little too deliberately constructed for me to lose myself in the story. Nevertheless, I was starting to get invested in the main character by the end, and thus was disappointed when the author dropped the inchoate emo angle and went back to cold cynicism. And yet, it is cold cynicism that characterizes the genre, and as such, was entirely appropriate.

Rating: 3/5

Published by Harcourt, Inc., 2003

Advertisements

About rhapsodyinbooks

We're into reading, politics, and intellectual exchanges.
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Review of “Gun, With Occasional Music” by Jonathan Lethem

  1. Sandy says:

    Nope, wouldn’t have touched it with a ten foot pole, just based on that cover. Not even sure now if I’d read it, but a few things that you mentioned tickled my fancy. Addicted to make? Karma points? It gave me a smile this early morning.

  2. BermudaOnion says:

    Yeah, I don’t think that’s for me. The drug names make me think of my father. He said the only way to not get pregnant was to take a drug called noassatol.

  3. zibilee says:

    I also really like weird and unusual fiction, and this sounds like it would be really interesting. I am doubting that it would be hanging out in my big box store, but I am sure I can find a copy. The images and the scenes that you describe just sound totally strange, and I can’t get them to stop rolling about my head. I am going to add this one to my list. Thanks for the very well constructed and intriguing review.

  4. I’m pretty sure I have this book (or maybe Motherless Brooklyn, I’m not sure) but either way, I want to read THIS one immediately. I don’t consider myself an outré-o-phile (love that!) but I do like noir.

  5. softdrink says:

    I think I need to add outré-o-phile to my resume. Although it probably wouldn’t get me anywhere.

    And I still need to read this! Ack…too many books!

  6. Jenners says:

    This does sound out there (and, hence, perfect for Jill) but i can see that it might be too aggressively weird to draw you in. I like the idea of having ominous music play if a gun points at me though. (Not that I want a gun pointed at me. I don’t.)

  7. Wow, this may be more PKD than PKD, giving due weight to kangaroos and babyheads. I’m passing this review along to a friend who is just starting an English PhD.

  8. That does seem kind of off the wall. I really don’t think this is one for me.

  9. Raymond Chandler meets Philip K. Dick? Evolved animals in menial jobs? The population controlled by drugs? (Well, that last part is not too hard for me to imagine.) This definitely sounds unique and intriguing. I am not sure this would be a book for me, but I loved reading about it.

    http://eclecticbooksandmovies.blogspot.com/

  10. Staci@LifeintheThumb says:

    I love how you will and can just read anything! that cover is crazy!!

  11. bookingmama says:

    Not sure this one is for me but I love that you picked it up and reviewed it.

  12. stacybuckeye says:

    What fun! I love books like this for about an hour and then I get tired of the ‘deliberately constructed’ prose. After awhile I just want to enjoy myself!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s