Review of “A Dog At Sea” by J. F. Englert

This is the third book in the Bull Moose Dog Run mystery series featuring Randolph, “a Labrador retriever with a penchant for literature” (not to mention pigs in the blanket) and his owner Harry, (“dangerously abstract and artistic”) who needs a little secret guidance from Randolph to help solve mysteries.

In A Dog At Sea, the two board the Nordic Bliss for a dog-lover’s cruise (giving new meaning to the term Poop Deck) to Curacao, sponsored by a pharmaceutical company marketing the dog drug SedaDog. Ostensibly this is just a pleasure cruise, but in fact, Randolph and Harry are heading for Curacao in search of Imogen, Randolph’s original owner and Harry’s lady love, who disappeared a year and a half before.

Coincidentally on the cruise are most of the characters from the previous books in the series, including Jackson Temple, Harry’s friend and benefactor, Ivan Manners, a self-styled ghost-hunter, Zest Kilpatrick, a nightly news reporter who has eyes for Harry, and Blinko Patterson, the executor of Imogen’s grandfather’s estate. Blinko warns Harry and Randolph that nefarious agents may be on board seeking clues to Imogen’s whereabouts.

In the midst of all this, on the very first night, Kitty, the wife of “The Dog Mutterer” was seen jumping overboard: an apparent suicide. Randolph suspects murder most foul, and has to come up with a way to communicate this with Harry.

Meanwhile, Harry resists efforts to help Randolph become thin by taking SedaDog, so the ship dog trainer, Jock Johnson, hangs a sign on Randolph: Please Do Not Feed Me. The sign sounds an alarm if Randolph gets too close too food, providing one more obstacle he must overcome in his quest to solve the crime.

In fact, The Dog Mutterer himself is an obstacle; he seems to have a hypnotic effect on Randolph, and Randolph discovers to his amazement that The Dog Mutterer can understand his thoughts when he barks.

Throughout most of all this, Harry is blissfully unaware of what is transpiring, occasionally swigging down mojitos and occasionally offering them back up in moments of the ship’s turbulence.

By the end the reader learns whether Randolph can stay on a diet; if he can help Harry solve the crime; if the two of them find Imogen, or if the bad guys will find them first.

Evaluation: This book is a diverting and sometimes laugh-out-loud way to pass the time. Some ends inexplicably remain loose, such as: how is it “The Dog Mutterer” can both affect and understand Randolph and other dogs? Nevertheless, much of the book is fun and clever, and Randolph is very endearing.

Rating: 3/5

Published by Dell, 2009

Note: I sent Randolph an email, asking him about the loose ends. His owner, J.F. Englert, apparently having hacked Randolph’s email account, read my missive and sent a reply. [Reminder to self: send Randolph information about password security.] He addressed some specific questions I had and then observed:

“The universe of these books is a playful one and a magical-satirical one (if that is a word). I sometimes think that our pre-occupation with verisimilitude in fiction is genuinely odd since, after all, the very act of reading is so clearly artificial. Certainly any plot, even the most supposedly realistic one, is full of mind-numbing coincidences and trumped up drama (so unlike real life). So much must be left out and so much distorted –in fact, almost without fail those books that are heralded as being most realistic so often strike me as being the farthest thing from reality (I prefer a Dante-reading Labrador any day). While my publisher has framed the books as mysteries first, everything else second, they were never really intended this way since Randolph, as you point out, is the core. That is to say, there is more Evelyn Waugh than Conan Doyle in these books, especially the latest one and Randolph, being Randolph, is not one to do a “Murder She Wrote” summation of every loose end at the book’s conclusion (he’s far too disorganized for this and besides there’s his stomach to think about). I think Randolph might occasionally fancy himself Hercule Poirot, but really the only thing they share is the waddle. Unfortunately, genre can be a strait-jacket and shape our reading experience. This brings me to end on the sensibility question since it is the sensibility that determines how these books are read. The people who will be most disappointed by these books are people who opened them hungering for a police procedural or something like one; the people who will be most delighted by them will be those who accepted it [as with Cervantes] when characters in later Quixote adventures had somehow read the earlier adventures (though this defied the laws of physics and common sense).”

R. Englert and J.F. Englert

Advertisements

About rhapsodyinbooks

We're into reading, politics, and intellectual exchanges.
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Review of “A Dog At Sea” by J. F. Englert

  1. Julie P. says:

    I read a Randolph book and just loved him! I thought the book was a clever idea and entertaining as well. I am impressed that the author took time from his schedule to address your questions.

  2. bermudaonion says:

    Okay, the poop deck pun was pretty bad. The book sounds like so much fun and right up my alley! By the way, I have a feeling that Randolph owns J. F.

  3. stacybuckeye says:

    This series looks like too much fun 🙂

  4. Alyce says:

    I think these books would definitely be different from my normal reading! 🙂 I think if I was in the right mood though I would probably like them (especially as a lab owner).

  5. Valerie says:

    Looks like a fun series! Winston (not a black lab, though; he’s a golden retriever) is trying to talk me into checking this out.

  6. Rita K says:

    I liked the others. I guess I will need to read this one, too. But you know I don’t have to have all the loose ends tied up so I like what the author said.

  7. Jenners says:

    That cover is so funny … and I love the idea of the “Dog Mutterer.” I’m glad I won an earlier book in this series from you so I can try it out.

  8. Staci says:

    I just received the first book (I believe) that I won from you the other day…can’t wait to jump into this world!

  9. Margot says:

    If the author’s note is an example of his writing (which of course it is) then this book must be hilarious. I also thought your review was hilarious. I’m glad you enjoyed the book.

  10. Barbara says:

    Poop deck? 😀 You are so funny. Randolph’s look-a-like lives down the street from me. Her name is Cora, can you believe it? Sounds like a fun series for when you’re in the right mood for nonsense.

  11. Belle says:

    I wasn’t too sure about this one, but then in the author’s email note, just reading “I think Randolph might occasionally fancy himself Hercule Poirot, but really the only thing they share is the waddle” made me click right over to my library!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.