Review of “The Circle” by Dave Eggers

It seems as if this author has attempted to write an updated version of 1984 with a bit of Dante’s Inferno thrown into the mix. Big Brother in this case is The Circle, a Google-like company that seeks to control every social interaction on the planet.

628x471

The story is told from the point of view of Mae Holland, a 24-year-old “newbie” at the company, all bright-eyed and eager, who buys into the company’s philosophy so thoroughly she is soon contributing her own bromides to be used as company mottos: Secrets Are Lies, Sharing is Caring, and Privacy is Theft. (These resonate with company denizens even more than the catchphrases already used by The Circle, such as All That Happens Must Be Known. Mae’s sayings are, after all, not only half the length, but mimic more closely the slogans used by the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s 1984, viz.: War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.)

Rising through the company with spectacular speed (and ridiculously unrealistic work output), Mae soon becomes the “Virgil” (as in Dante’s Inferno) of The Circle, using her ever-present videocam/microphone to guide the outside world to the wonders of the company and its activities. The adoration and feedback Mae receives turn her into something like a rat on cocaine. Soon she is working even more incessantly to elicit higher ratings and accolades, and becoming ever more obsequious and blind to the shark-like predations of The Circle.

After a while, nothing is sacred to Mae anymore – not her family nor her former friends. The only thing that unsettles her perfect serenity is the occurrence of occasional visits from a mysterious guy named Kalden, who keeps warning her about The Circle, and trying to get her to turn on the company.

Who is Kalden and what’s his agenda? And will Mae even be able to pay attention? Or will the author emulate Orwell yet again with his ending?

Discussion: To say this book jumps the shark would be too meta, given that there is an actual omnivorous shark kept in a tank at the innermost depths of The Circle. But this book is so allegorical, so “anvilicious” that the characters (and aquatic creatures), who are more Types or Symbols than people, just didn’t engage me at all. [As described by tvtropes. org, “anvilicious” describes the use of dialogue or plot points to convey a particular message in such an obvious or unsubtle way that the author may as well etch it onto an anvil and drop it on your head.]

As for Mae, she is so utterly shallow and (to employ an appropriate contronym, or word that is its own antonym) dense, that it beggars belief that Kalden would (a) take an interest in her and (b) think that she could actually plumb some not-even-hinted-at depth of character.

Evaluation: I have heard so many great things about this author; I was hoping for perhaps an even more sophisticated and ominous version of the book Where’d You Go, Bernadette?. Instead, I felt robbed after I finished it. This is not to say there isn’t plenty to worry about from the growth of “Big Data” and “HyperData” and increasing availability of surveillance tools, but I think Eggers erred by trying too hard to be like George Orwell.

Rating: 2/5

Published by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House, 2013

About these ads

13 Responses

  1. Well, I had high hopes for this one, but I am not a fan of books that derive heavily from past works. Plus, shallowness of characters turns me off. So I’ll keep off from this for now.

  2. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinteresting. Hm. Probably not for me, but I have to confess I almost snorted my coffee everywhere at your jumped the literal shark bit!

  3. I have never had luck with Dave Eggers. I know people love him, but I haven’t found the book by him that blows me away.

  4. I haven’t been wowed by this author. I know he is very popular and I’ve heard her talk and stuff but his writing doesn’t always work for me.

  5. This book got really good reviews in EW, but then (I think) I saw that it was a million pages long and I got uninterested. In order to pick up something tome-ish, I need some heavy selling.

  6. I have never liked books that try to drop an anvil on my head. Thank you for a lovely new-to-me word, though!

  7. Vance had to read A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius when he was in college. I picked it up when he brought it home and really like it. Eggers has had an interesting life, to say the least.

  8. I’ve read a few books by this author and liked them. So sorry thing one did not work for you. I’m waiting for the audio version.

  9. I’ve heard other similar things which has swayed me from this book. But then I’ve heard great things too lol. I’ll hold off on this one!

  10. I read one Eggers and that was enough for me. I had a couple of opportunities to read this, but turned them all down.

  11. The synopsis sounds fantastic (and I haven’t even read 1984!) but saying that the book is over the top unrealistic and the characters shallow… that would be a no for me then :)

  12. Not for me, but Google is scary :)

  13. Well, that’s a bummer. The premise of this book sounded so good, it’s a pity that it didn’t turn out that way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 359 other followers

%d bloggers like this: